Could Alex Jones’ Attorneys be Punished for Allegedly Releasing Personal Records? – NBC Connecticut

It was a bombshell enhancement in the Alex Jones defamation case in Texas last week just after Scarlett Lewis’ lawyer discovered the contents of Jones’ mobile phone and likely the own healthcare documents of the plaintiffs in the Connecticut defamation case.

The information were being improperly produced to Lewis’ legal team. Now, a Connecticut decide is hoping to establish if Jones’ attorney Norm Pattis, who is symbolizing the InfoWars host in the defamation scenario in this article, along with his Texas lawyer should face disciplinary motion.

Last week, Lewis’ legal professional Mark Bankston told the courtroom he considered it was Pattis who supplied all those data files to Jones’ Texas lawyer Andino Reynal.

“That’s not the serious story of what occurred, it’s just not. We know what transpired below, Norm Pattis up in Connecticut was passing this file alongside to Mr. Reynal and I know that due to the fact the listing has a SharePoint OneDrive backup to Norm Pattis’ computer system,” Bankston advised the Texas courtroom.

In a digital hearing Wednesday from Waterbury Outstanding Court docket, Choose Barbara Bellis advised Pattis’ lawyer she’s now contacting for present induce hearings for the two him and Reynal, inquiring that they supply responses and evidence as to how the records, which could consist of the plaintiffs in the Connecticut case’s health-related and/or psychiatric documents, have been allegedly delivered to Lewis’ lawful group in Texas.

According to courtroom transcript, the decide needs to know, “When they have been sent. The amount of technological expertise the sender experienced. If the personnel despatched the information, beneath what attorney’s supervision. What information were despatched. Ended up they professional medical and psychiatric data, or other documents issue to the Court’s protective get?”  

“I want to know specifically who been given the documents. And if that requires testimony from attorneys or other people in the Texas circumstance, so be it,” Bellis stated.

Both of those Pattis and Reynal’s hearings are established for future week. NBC Connecticut spoke with Pattis’ legal professional Wesley Mead Thursday who claimed he had no remark at this time. 

Jury choice in the Connecticut defamation case is continue to postponed right until there is a choice from the individual bankruptcy court docket on the situation. A hearing is set for that at the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Bridgeport Friday afternoon.